Legal Opinion

Kolkman v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 11, 1987No. 57A04-8609-CV-00270PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Lonnie Kolkman (Lonnie) and Kim Kolkman (Kim, collectively the Kolkmans) appeal a summary judgment in favor of Falstaff Brewing Corporation (Falstaff).

We affirm.

ISSUES

The Kolkmans present three issues for our review. We restate them as two:

1. whether driving while intoxicated constitutes wilful and wanton misconduct barring the intoxicated driver’s action to recover damages from the social host who furnished the alcohol to him; and

2. whether Kim’s claim for loss of consortium is derivative of Lonnie’s action and barred because of Lonnie’s wilful and wanton…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. DeVaney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Board of Com'rs of Cass County v. NevittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Lantis v. CondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Rosander v. Copco Steel & Engineering Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Schwartz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tuggle v. Allright Parking Systems, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Robbins v. McCarthyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Booker, Inc. v. MorrillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. McCoy v. Colonial Baking Co. Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Wohlwend v. EdwardsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API