Kolkman v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Lonnie Kolkman (Lonnie) and Kim Kolkman (Kim, collectively the Kolkmans) appeal a summary judgment in favor of Falstaff Brewing Corporation (Falstaff).
We affirm.
ISSUES
The Kolkmans present three issues for our review. We restate them as two:
1. whether driving while intoxicated constitutes wilful and wanton misconduct barring the intoxicated driver’s action to recover damages from the social host who furnished the alcohol to him; and
2. whether Kim’s claim for loss of consortium is derivative of Lonnie’s action and barred because of Lonnie’s wilful and wanton…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- DeVaney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Board of Com'rs of Cass County v. NevittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Lantis v. CondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Rosander v. Copco Steel & Engineering Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Schwartz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tuggle v. Allright Parking Systems, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Robbins v. McCarthyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Booker, Inc. v. MorrillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- McCoy v. Colonial Baking Co. Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Wohlwend v. EdwardsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.