Legal Opinion

Concrete Appliances Co. v. Gomery

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 24, 1923No. 2982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In principle, this case concerns the use of gravity in conveying mobile substances from an elevated common central point to various working points; in application, to the distribution of “wet” or “mush” concrete. Referring to the above general principle of conveying mobile matter by gravity, we have the age-worn practice of lifting water by power to a reservoir and by gravity distributing it through conduits to a fixed point or by hose to diverse points; in other words, the problem of lifting it to a gravity-sufficient height, of there accumulating it in storage,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elliott & Co. v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
  2. Concrete Appliances Co. v. MeinkenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Concrete Appliances Co. v. GomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Morrow v. OelschlagerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API