Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Oelschlager

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 3, 1926No. 3364PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

With the possibilities of broader use in the building art of concrete, when wet, came a rapid adaption of old methods to this new field. The mobility of the initial mixture gave an ease in use, and the later rapid hardening a rigidity and stability of result, at once novel and remarkable. But, after all, it was usually but the advance incident to the use of concrete in connection with old structures and known methods. At the same time the change was, on the surface, so remarkable that, unless guarded against, a subtle and plausible temptation confronted courts to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turner v. Lauter Piano Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
  2. Concrete Appliances Co. v. GomeryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
  3. MacArthur Concrete Pile & Foundation Co. v. Simplex Concrete Piling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Young v. John McShain, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  2. In re SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
  3. Sanford Inv. v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API