Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 6, 1951No. 33836PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

Plaintiff brought suit individually and as guardian of her husband, Ralph G. Hudson, an incompetent, to rescind a contract and recover earnest money paid thereunder. Subsequent to bringing the action, the husband died, and the suit was continued by plaintiff as his administratrix.

About September 2, 1946, plaintiff and her husband, residents of California, stopped at a tourist court in Vinita, Oklahoma, owned by defendants, El-liotts, and McCandlesses, but encumbered by a mortgage in favor of the defendant bank. Learning the property was "for sale Hudson expressed interest in purchasing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hansbrough v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. GoforthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Hurley v. AnickerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Helm v. RoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Sonken-Galambra Corp. v. AbelsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Massey v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  2. Massey v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API