Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Investment Securities Corp. v. Joslyn

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

The plaintiff is the owner and holder of bonds issued by a California corporation of which .the defendants are stockholders. By the present action the plaintiff would enforce against each defendant a proportionate stockholder's liability based upon provisions formerly existing in the Constitution and Civil Code of California. Under such provisions of law it is claimed that each defendant herein is individually and personally liable as a stockholder for such proportion of the corporation’s debts and liabilities, contracted or incurred during the time the defendant was a stockholder, as the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Public National Bank v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Gaines v. . Fidelity Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Gray v. H.H. Vought CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Bowlby v. McQuailNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Los Angeles Investment Securities Corp. v. JoslynNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Claim of Rusyniak v. Syracuse Flying School, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. 24 Rock Corp. v. Tomasello Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API