Legal Opinion
Claim of Rusyniak v. Syracuse Flying School, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 10, 1975PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
We conclude that it cannot be said that the Workmen’s Compensation Board abused its discretion as a matter of law when it denied the application of this employer and its insurance carrier for a rehearing and reconsideration of the issues in this case.
Following the decedent’s death on December 6, 1965, Pauline Rusyniak asserted a claim on behalf of the decedent’s six minor children. On August 22, 1967 a referee found that she was the decedent’s divorced wife and not herself a statutory beneficiary or dependent. At an adjourned hearing on October 1, 1969 claimant testified that her 1960 Alabama…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re the Claim of FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Claim of Barrow v. Loon Lake Hotel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Claim of McNamara v. New Process Gear DivisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Claim of Lawrence v. Meyer-Garry, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Los Angeles Investment Securities Corp. v. JoslynNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Claim of Barone v. Interstate Maintenance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Burris v. OlcottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Claim of MacKenzie v. Management RecruitersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Sammaritano v. Attractive Fashions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Claim of Harris v. Phoenix Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.