Legal Opinion
Bowlby v. McQuail
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 15, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs moved under Civil Practice Rules 103, 104, 109, 112, 113, “ and generally,” to strike out an entire answer and for summary judgment. The motion was denied and on appeal to the Appellate Division the order was affirmed, permission given to appeal to this court and certifying thirteen questions.
The order which we are asked to review is an intermediate one. The only.power this court has to review such an order is by virtue of the permission granted by the Appellate Division on the questions certified. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 588, subd. 3.) The questions which are certified limit the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grannan v. . Westchester Racing Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Schieffelin v. . HylanNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gregoire v. G. P. Putnam's SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Public National Bank v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Mohrmann v. KobNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Los Angeles Investment Securities Corp. v. JoslynNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.