Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Campbell v. Judges' Retirement Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1966No. Calendar 8, Docket 51,134Published

1ConcurrenceBlack, J.

The final clause appearing in the form of agreemeut signed by plaintiffs1 is wholly void for want of authority in the retirement act for inclusion thereof in the required “agreement.”

The form of agreement called for by section ll was designed to bind the signing member “to all provisions of this act” as the act stood at the time of execution of the agreement; not to the act plus all amendments the legislature might decide to enact and place in effect with or without knowledge of those affected thereby (retirants especially). Indeed, there would be no contractual relationship between a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Superx Drugs Corp. v. State Board of PharmacyMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Superx Drugs Corp. v. State Board of PharmacyMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Mark v. BD. OF HIGHER EDUC. OF CITY OF NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API