Legal Opinion

Larabee Flour Mills Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1906No. 15,167PublishedCited by 10 opinions

• Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The plaintiff asks that a writ of mandamus be issued to compel the defendant to perform certain of its duties as a common carrier. The facts as found by a commissioner app.ointed to take the testimony and report findings of fact are as follow:

“(1) In the succeeding findings the Missouri Pacific Railway Company will be referred to as ‘the Mis- • souri Pacific’; the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company as ‘the Santa Fe’; the Missouri Valley Car Service and Storage Association as ‘the car-service association’; and the plaintiff as ‘the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Rhodes v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. McNeill v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. New York Ex Rel. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gray v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Larabee Flour Mills Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Clay County Cooperative Telephone Ass'n v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State ex rel. Public Service Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API