Legal Opinion

Cal-Almond, Inc. v. Yeutter

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 14, 1991No. CIV. S-90-1313-WBSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHUBB, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), based on plaintiff’s failure to exhaust its administrative remedies. The matter was heard and submitted on January 28, 1991.

I

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff (“Cal-Almond”) is an almond “handler” as defined in the Almond Marketing Order (“Order”) 7 C.F.R. § 981.1 et seq. Defendants are the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (“Secretary”), the United States Department of Agriculture…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MacY v. DaltonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
  2. Benten Ex Rel. Tyrer v. KesslerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  3. Santillan v. GonzalesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API