Legal Opinion
Drew v. First Sav. of New Hampshire
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided April 2, 1997No. Civil 95-495-SDPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs object to a Report and Recommendation (R & R) of the magistrate judge. The court has conducted the requisite de novo review of the R & R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Elmendorf Grafica, Inc. v. D.S. America (East), Inc., 48 F.3d 46, 49-50 (1st Cir.1995).
1. Background 1
Plaintiffs Eunice Drew and Joan Went-worth are former employees of defendant Bank. Seeking relief under federal and state law, they claim money damages for perceived sexual harassment against them by defendant Stephanie Kruy, a supervisory employee of Bank. 2
Drew was employed by Bank as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Annabelle Lipsett v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Garita Hotel Limited Partnership, Etc. v. Ponce Federal Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Ronald C. Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.