Anderson v. Argraves
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
Identical demurrers are filed to identical complaints and the issues thus presented are the subject of this memorandum, which is equally applicable to each case. The two actions will be discussed as though they were one.
The writ names the defendant Argraves “as Highway Commissioner of the State of Connecticut.” The complaint alleges, in substance, that it was the defendant’s duty to erect and maintain “safe and adequate roads and bridges, in order to avoid any injuries to person and property by reason of any neglect or default.” The plaintiffs then claim that on a specified part of a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bartram v. Town of SharonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Hewison v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
- Anselmo v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Hay v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Gustafson v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Giannoni v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Freter v. Embassy Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Giannoni v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016