Gustafson v. City of Meriden
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.
This action was tried to the jury to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate by reason of the defect, hereinafter described, in Cook Avenue, a public highway in defendant city. The plaintiff offered evidence to prove, and the jury might reasonably have found, that the plaintiff’s intestate was in the occupancy of the side-car of a motorcycle which was driven by one Johnson on Cook Avenue, at 4 a.m. on June 22d, 1924; that on the traveled surface of this highway three large holes had existed for an unreasonable time, rendering the highway unsafe for public travel; that it was at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bartram v. Town of SharonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Cunningham, Admx. v. Fair Haven Westville R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Upton v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Friedler v. HekelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- L. & N. R. R. v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Murray v. City of MilfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- State v. EricksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Rokus v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Murray v. City Of MilfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Bovat v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.