Legal Opinion

Padron v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 2002No. A01A1956, A01A1957PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Chief Judge.

By interlocutory appeal, Beatriz Padrón and Orestes Cabrera challenge the trial court’s denial of their separate motions to suppress certain evidence found in their luggage during a search of the trunk of their vehicle. After review, we find that the trial court misapplied controlling law, and we reverse.

When reviewing a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, we must adopt the trial court’s findings of fact unless those findings are clearly erroneous and not supported by any evidence. State v. David. However, when conducting such review, we owe no deference to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. State v. DavidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Daniel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. State v. JourdanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. State v. McMichaelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. State v. WhittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API