Legal Opinion
United States v. Hardeman Jackson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 24, 1976No. 75-2129PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant (hereafter referred to as defendant) Hardeman Jackson was convicted for assaulting a postal employee in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111. Defendant raises the following questions on appeal: whether the defendant’s right to a speedy trial was violated; whether statements made by the Government during closing argument require a new trial; whether the trial court erred in refusing to submit a special interrogatory to the jury; whether the court below improperly limited the scope of voir dire; and whether the evi dence was sufficient to prove…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Aldridge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. David T. DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Dillingham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- United States v. BenabeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Eugene Williams Gall, Jr. v. Phil Parker, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Richard Clinton AllsupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Michael J. McNeese and Laura ConwellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Kojo Sababu, Jaime Delgado, and Dora GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.