Legal Opinion
Southern Ry. Co. v. Moore
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 2, 1931No. 45PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment herein is reversed, upon the ground, as matter of law, that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain a finding that negligence of the petitioner was the cause of the death of respondent’s intestate.' Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Coogan, 271 *582U. S. 472, 474, 478; Atlantic Coast Line v. Driggers, 279 U. S. 787, 788; Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Toops, 281 U. S. 351, 354-355.
Messrs. S. R. Prince, H. O’B. Cooper, Frank G. Tompkins, and L. E. Jeffries were on the brief for petitioner. Mr. Wm. C. Wolfe was on the brief for respondent. See 161 S. E. 525.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ToopsSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DriggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Moore v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. DoerksenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- John Robert Shaw, as of the Estate of Anthony Alma Rahner, Deceased v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company and Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Lumber Institute of Allegheny CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- New York Central R. v. FarmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Swaner v. Utah Idaho Cent. R.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931