Legal Opinion · Dissent

Swaner v. Utah Idaho Cent. R.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 23, 1931No. 341Published

1DissentMcDERMOTT, Circuit Judge

I am unable to agree with my associates for three reasons:(a) Where a jury must speculate as to the cause of an accident — where several things may have caused it — I do not think the point can be “guarded by proper instructions to the jury.” I think such a case should not be submitted to the jury.

*866(b) It is true that the defendant did not prove that the jerk in fact resulted from one of the other probable causes. But neither did plaintiff prove that the jerk in fact was occasioned by the acts of Mr. Clark, the train-master. Where the uncontradicted evidence discloses several things that might…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Looney v. Metropolitan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ToopsSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. New York Central Railroad v. AmbroseSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API