Moschella v. Kilderry
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
This is a suit in equity under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 175, §§ 112, 113, and c. 214, § 3 (10), to enforce the liability of the New Amsterdam Casualty Company (hereinafter called the insurer) under a policy issued by it pursuant to the compulsory motor vehicle insurance law. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 90, §§ 34A-34J. At the request of both parties the trial judge reported the case to this court, incorporating the pleadings as a part thereof. The report concludes: “If my findings and rulings are warranted in fact or law a decree is to be entered dismissing the bill; if in any respect they are not so…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- O'Roak v. Lloyds Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Johnson v. O'LalorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Blair v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
3Cited by13 opinions
- Norris v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Blair v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. De MaisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Novo v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Woznicki v. Travelers Insurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.