State v. Sheckles
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 665.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. SHECKLES, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Sheckles,
2024-Ohio-3339.] Criminal law—Touhy regulations do not create rights for criminal defendants, and a violation of such regulations is not generally a basis for a criminal defendant to request an exclusionary remedy—Touhy regulations are not rules governing admissibility of evidence to be wielded by a criminal defendant to exclude testimony of a current or former federal employee— Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- State v. GrubbOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Kettering v. HollenOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. DownsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ShecklesOhio Supreme Court · 2024