Legal Opinion

State v. Sheckles

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2024No. 2023-0294PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 665.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. SHECKLES, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Sheckles,

2024-Ohio-3339.] Criminal law—Touhy regulations do not create rights for criminal defendants, and a violation of such regulations is not generally a basis for a criminal defendant to request an exclusionary remedy—Touhy regulations are not rules governing admissibility of evidence to be wielded by a criminal defendant to exclude testimony of a current or former federal employee— Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. State v. GrubbOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. City of Kettering v. HollenOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. DownsOhio Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ShecklesOhio Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API