Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Ted Hoyer & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 19, 1980, which denied its motion for leave to serve an amended answer so as to plead the affirmative defenses of a lack of personal jurisdiction over defendant and the running of the applicable Statute of Limitations. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. Defendant shall serve the amended answer within 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together *671with notice of entry thereof. Special Term…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lermit Plastics Co. v. C. W. Lauman & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cutwright v. Central Brooklyn Urban Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Naccarato v. KotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Fulford v. Baker Perkins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API