Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fulford v. Baker Perkins, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1984Published

1Dissent

Weinstein, J.,

dissents and votes to reverse the order appealed from and grant defendant’s motion, with the following memorandum: Defendant sought leave of the court to amend its answer to include the three affirmative defenses of nonprivity, failure to state a cause of action and the Statute of Frauds. The motion was made approximately five years after the action was commenced and some four and one-half years after the joinder of issue. The omission of the subject defenses allegedly became apparent upon a review of the pleadings by defendant’s newly obtained counsel. Plaintiff opposed the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murray v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Caruso v. Ted Hoyer & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Martin v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API