Legal Opinion
Gose v. City of Douglas
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided October 13, 2008No. S-07-0242PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[11] The City of Douglas (City) did not approve a subdivision proposed by Appellants Richard and Celeste Gose (the Goses). The Goses filed a complaint seeking money damages from the City, based on a claim of inverse condemnation. The district court dismissed the damages claim, with prejudice, because, among other reasons, the Goses' complaint did not allege that their notice of governmental claim complied with the certification and signature requirements contained in Wyo. Const. art. 16, § 7. While we agree that dismissal of the damages claim was proper, we find that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Utah Construction Co. v. State Highway CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
- Board of Trustees of the University of Wyoming v. BellWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Amrein v. Wyoming Livestock BoardWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Sublette County Board of County Commissioners v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Garman Ex Rel. Garman v. Campbell County School District No. 1Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Brown v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- McCann v. City of CodyWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Motley v. Platte CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Stephen Smith and Audrey Smith, husband and wife v. Board of County Commissioners of Park County, WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.