Bart v. Pierce County
Washington Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Shackleford, J., entered April 26, 1910, in favor of the defendant, upon an agreed statement of facts, in an action to recover the unearned portion of a liquor license fee.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.
On the 28th day of April, 1909, the board <of county commissioners of Pierce county granted a license to the plaintiff to sell spirituous, fermented, malt, and other intoxicating liquors, on certain premises in the town of Wilkeson in said county, particularly designated and described on the face of the license, for the term of one year from that -date. On the 12th day of July, 1909, the town of Wilkeson became incorporated as a town of the fourth class, under the general laws of the state, and thereafter passed an ordinance providing for the regulation and sale of intoxicating liquors within…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Allsman v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Pearson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Lydick v. KornerNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- State ex rel. Conway v. WeberNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Olympia Brewing Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Roberts v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Peterson v. Town of GuernseyWyoming Supreme Court · 1919
- Gubin v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
- Charles Blum Co. v. Town of HastingsSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.