Charles Blum Co. v. Town of Hastings
Supreme Court of Florida
Writ of Error to Circuit Court for St. Johns County, George Couper Gibbs, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBrowne, C. J.
The seventh count of the declaration in this case alleges in substance that the Charles Blum *8Company paid tlie City of Hastings the sum of $2,000.00, for the privilege of selling wines, beers and liquors for the term of one year, from October 1st, 1913; that on the 2nd day of April, 1914, a local option election was held in St. Johns County and the precinct in which the town of Hastings is. situated voted against the sale of liquor; plaintiff’s license thereby became revoked through no act or fault of his, and he was deprived of the use thereof from the 2nd' day of April to the 1st day of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Northrop's executors v. GravesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- Allsman v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Town of Phoebus v. Manhattan Social ClubSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Commonwealth ex rel. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
- McGinnis v. Inhabitants of MedwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burnham Hotel v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- College Inn Food Products Co. v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1948