Legal Opinion

Pearson v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1896No. 1923PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.— Hon. Richard Osborn, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

On February 4, 1893, the respondent paid to the city of Seattle the sum of $1,000 and procured a license designated as an “ amusement license,” under ordinance No. 1790, which is an amendment of ordinance No. 1723 of said city. After procuring this license he conducted a public dance in connection with his saloon, in which intoxicating liquors were sold and disposed of, until December 28,1893, at which time ordinance No. 3152, providing for the punishment of any person who shall conduct, manage, carry on or take part in any dance in any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martel v. City of East St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Lydick v. KornerNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State ex rel. Johnson v. CornwellNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Levy v. Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Tranfaglia v. Building CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Collins v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API