Legal Opinion
Salehsari v. Aalam (In re Aalam)
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Decided February 24, 2014No. Case No. : 1:09-bk-20792-VK; Adv. No.: 1: 10-ap-01533-VKPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Victoria S. Kaufman, United States Bankruptcy Judge
Farhad Salehsari (“Salehsari” or the “Plaintiff’) is requesting a determination that, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and (a)(6), obligations of Mahnaz Aalam (“Aalam”) and Mehdy Gharachehdaghy. (“Gharachehdaghy” and together with Aa-lam, the “Defendants”) to the Plaintiff are nondischargeable. The Court conducted the trial on February 24, 2014; the Plaintiff and the Defendants submitted trial briefs and post-trial briefs. Having considered the declarations of Salehsari, Aa-lam and Gharachehdaghy submitted for trial,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Whatley v. Stijakovich-Santilli (In Re Stijakovich-Santilli)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- McGuinness v. Gannon (In re Gannon)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez (In re Rodriguez)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2017
- In re: Rhonda Stijakovich-SantilliUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Smith, Jr. v. LookofskyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2022