Continental Oil Company v. Doornbos
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NORVELL, Justice.
The Doornbos plaintiffs (William Doorn-bos and others, successors in interest to C. Doornbos) sought, among other things, a declaration that a certain deed executed by Continental Oil Company to A. R. Mc-Elreath and F. W. Suggett, dated January 26, 1943, conveyed no more than a one thirty-second royalty interest in the minerals underlying the lands described in such deed. They further prayed that a deed executed by Continental Oil Company to C. Doornbos on April 23, 1945, be reformed. The trial court decreed that the Doornbos plaintiffs take nothing against the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
- Sun Oil Co. v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Peques v. DilworthTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Burrows v. SealeTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Continental Oil Company v. DoornbosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
3Cited by24 opinions
- Cherokee Water Co. v. ForderhauseTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- RHN CORP. v. VeibellUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- National Resort Communities, Inc. v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- McClellan v. Boehmer, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
- Ace Drug Marts, Inc. v. SterlingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.