Legal Opinion
Hufft v. Horowitz
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1992No. G010372PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SONENSHINE, J.
Larry D. Hufft appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of American Medical Systems, Inc. (AMS) in a product liability action involving an allegedly defective inflatable penile prosthesis. Hufft contends the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because triable issues of material fact exist as to all causes of action. In our review, we must decide whether the rule of Brown v. Superior Court (1988) 44 Cal.3d 1049 [245 Cal.Rptr. 412, 751 P.2d 470], immunizing manufacturers of prescription drugs from strict liability for design defects, should be extended to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1991
- Toole v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Christopher v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (In Re Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Pinnacle Hip Implant Prod. Liab. Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Mariann HOPKINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOW CORNING CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Teselle v. McLoughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Garrett v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Tansy v. Dacomed Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.