Legal Opinion
Hare v. Postmaster General
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 21, 2007No. 05-5238UnpublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Jamie G. Hare brought a variety of Title VII retaliation and gender discrimination claims against her employer, the United States Post Office. The District Court granted the Postmaster General’s motion for summary judgment as to all of her claims. We will reverse and remand as to two of Hare’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) and as to one of her claims under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a): that the Post Office retaliated against her by not selecting her for an internal managerial skills improvement class; that the Post Office retaliated…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Atron Castleberry v. STI GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- McKinnon v. GonzalesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- McCloud v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Bluebeard's Castle, Inc. v. HodgeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2009
- Anderson v. DSM N.V.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.