Saunders Petroleum Co. v. Bowles
Emergency Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
McAllister, judge.
This case involves an order issued by the Office of Price Administration, pursuant to Maximum Price Regulation No. 88 — Fuel Oil, Gasoline, and Liquified Petroleum Gas.
The background of the controversy is as follows:
The Pokorney Oil Company — not a party to these proceedings — had a contract in 1943 to furnish residual fuel oil to the Nebraska Defense Corporation, an ordnance plant located at Mead, Neb.
In order to carry out its agreement, the Pokorney Company entered into a contract with the Saunders Petroleum Company, complainant herein, by the terms of which, the Saunders…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Todd v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Bowman v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of New York v. New York Telephone Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1972
- Halsted v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Porter v. Eastern Sugar AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Fleet-Wing Corp. v. ClarkEmergency Court of Appeals · 1948
- Pacific Gas Corp. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.