Legal Opinion

Van Husan v. Heames

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Mandamus. Delator applied for mandamus to compel the recording of a deed. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Section 135 of Act No. 206, Laws of 1893, reads as follows;

“When any deed, land contract, plat of any town site, village, or addition to any town site, village plat, or city, or other instrument for the conveyance of title to any real estate, is presented to the register of deeds of any' county in this State for record or filing in his office, he shall require of the person presenting the same a certificate from the Auditor General, or from the county treasurer of the *506county, -whether th'ere are any tax liens or titles held by the State, or any individual, against such piece or description of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Hall v. BurlingameMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. City of Grand Rapids v. BurlingameMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State ex rel. Ashton v. Register of DeedsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Youngblood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  2. Roberts Tobacco Co. v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Burrows v. Delta Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Langford v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Hushaw v. Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API