Legal Opinion

City of Grand Rapids v. Burlingame

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to proceed in certain condemnation proceedings. The facts .are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

The relator filed in the superior court of Grand Rapids a petition for the condemnation of all the rights of the Grandville Pland-Road Company in certain of the streets and highways of the said city, in the petition described. Summons was issued to the defendant, requiring it to appear and answer. Defendant appeared specially, and on the 21st day of September, 1892, the city attorney moved the court for an order directing the sheriff to write down the names of 24 disinterested freeholders of said city for the purpose of striking a jury *470therefrom. Defendant company, by its attorneys, filed…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vernor v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Rohan v. Detroit Racing AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Oxnard Beet Sugar Co. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Burrows v. Delta Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Van Husan v. HeamesMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API