Legal Opinion

Stelwagon Mfg. Co. v. Elvidge

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 7, 1929No. 103Published

1Per curiam

The appellee sued for damages resulting from a conspiracy to defraud. The evidence is ample, and indeed is not denied, justifying the trial court in submitting the issue of fraud and conspiracy to the jury. But complaint is made of the rule as to the measure of damages applied by the trial court. The court charged that, “if you find that two or more of the defendants are liable, you will then come to the question of damages; and tho rule is that you will award the plaintiff the difference between what the trade acceptance would have been worth if they had been as represented and what they are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Corsicana Nat. Bank of Corsicana v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Miller v. Continental Shipbuilding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  4. Baltimore & O. R. v. DarlingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
  5. Compagnie Générale Transatlantique v. BumpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API