Legal Opinion

Baltimore & O. R. v. Darling

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 4, 1925No. 4133PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Circuit Judge.

On the night and at the time that he was injured, plaintiff, one of defendant’s yard brakemen, a man of 18 years’ railroad experience, was engaged in riding an intrastate car over the hump or gravity track to classification track 14. His specific task was to control the car by means of a brake, so that when moving by gravity it might not collide with the other cars on the classification track to their and its possible damage.

Track 14 was the shortest track in the yard. At the time of the accident a number of cars, intrastate and interstate, were on it. It was nearly full.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Siegel v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  2. Grigsby v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
  3. Rice v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  4. Miller v. Lehigh Valley Rr. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Stelwagon Mfg. Co. v. ElvidgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API