McCormick v. Stevenson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Cuming county. Tided below before Barnes, J. cited 6th Wait’s Actions and Defenses, 163, et-seq. The notes were made in Illinois, and the laws of that state govern this case. Under those laws the machine would be liable to execution or attachment against the maker of the notes. JJIoGormiah v. Hadden, 37 111., 370. Murch v. Wright, 46 Id., 487. Latham v. Sumner, 89 Id., 233.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This is an action to recover for the alleged conversion by the defendant of certain property belonging' to the plaintiffs. A verdict was rendered in the court below in favor of the defendant, upon which judgment was rendered. The plaintiffs bring the cause into this'court by petition in error. It appears from the record that in July, 1877, the plaintiffs sold to J. A. Nason, of West Point, Neb., an Advance reaper and mower for the sum of $180.00, taking three notes therefor, each for the sum of $60.00, with interest from date. The first' of said notes was due on the first day of January,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Aultman, Miller & Co. v. MalloryNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by10 opinions
- Martin v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Brown v. James H. Campbell Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Starr v. Bankers Union of WorldNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- STATE SECURITIES COMPANY v. SvobodaNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Hill v. Campbell Commission Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.