Legal Opinion
Ricoh Co. v. Aeroflex Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 2, 2003No. M8-85(CM)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION AND NON-PARTY SY-NOPSYS’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA
MCMAHON, District Judge.
The present motion to quash is before this Court on the miscellaneous docket, and *67arises in the context of a patent infringement action between plaintiff Ricoh Company and defendants Aeroflex Inc., AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International Corporation, and Matrox Tech, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) which is currently before the District Court for the Northern District of California. Non-party Synopsys…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Construction Products Research, Inc. Five Star Products, Inc. And H. Nash BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- von Bulow v. von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Salomon Bros. Treasury Litigation v. Steinhardt Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Egiazaryan v. ZalmayevDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GuptaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Gerber v. Down East Community HospitalDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
- Ashton v. Al Qaeda IslamicDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.