Legal Opinion

Salomon Bros. Treasury Litigation v. Steinhardt Partners, L.P.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 8, 1993No. 873, Docket 93-3079PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TENNEY, Senior District Judge.

Defendants-petitioners Steinhardt Partners, L.P., Steinhardt Management Co. and Michael Steinhardt (collectively “Steinhardt”) are codefendants with several other parties in a civil class action suit alleging manipulation of the market for two-year Treasury notes during the Spring and Summer of 1991. In answer to a discovery request in the class action suit, Steinhardt identified as responsive a memorandum prepared by its attorneys and previously submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Ste-inhardt declined to produce the memorandum, claiming…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. Sanmina CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. In Re Qwest Communications International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. In re Kidder Peabody Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API