Rochford v. Albaugh
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, McCook county, Hon. Joseph W. Jones, Judge. Action by G. E. Rochford against H. E.- Albaugh. Prom an order granting a new trial after verdict for plaintiff, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.
This is an appeal from ah order granting a new trial. The action was brought upon a promissory note executed by the defendant. The defendant, in his answer, alleged as a defense that the note had been altered by writing *629the figure “6” before the figure ‘‘2,” making the same read “$62.70. ” and also writing the word “sixty before the words “two and seventy one hundredths dollars,” without the consent or acquiescence of the defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant moved for a new trial, which was granted; the order granting the same being as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alt v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Hodges v. BierleinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- McGill v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- Distad v. ShanklinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Esshom v. Watertown Hotel Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Root v. BinghamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Drew v. LawrenceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Corsica State Bank v. HeezenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Rex Buggy Co. v. DinneenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Blewett v. HendrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.