Legal Opinion

Waterman v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 25, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

At Raw. Action by Frank N. Waterman against the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company. On motion to remand.

1Opinion of the Court

RELRSTAB, District Judge.

This suit was removed into this court from the Supreme Court of the state of New Jersey. The plaintiff is the assignee of a, number of claims against the defendant. He is a citizen and resident of such state, but none of his assignors is. The defendant is a corporation of the state of Virginia, and not an inhabitant or resident of the state of New Jersey.

' [ 1 ] The right to remove depends upon the construction to be given to sections 24 (granting original jurisdiction), 28 (limiting the causes that may be removed), ■ and 51 (prescribing the court where suit is to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Ex Parte WisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Ex Parte HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. In Re WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Bushnell v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ostrom v. EdisonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1917
  2. Collins v. Public Service Commission of MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
  3. Isaac Kubie Co. v. Lehigh Valley R.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1919
  4. Stewart v. Cybur Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1914
  5. Cincinnati, H. & D. Ry. Co. v. OrrDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API