Legal Opinion
United States v. Real Property in Waterboro
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided September 8, 1995No. 93-2278, 94-1599 and 94-2036PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge.
These consolidated appeals involve third-party claims to real properties in Bangor and Portland, Maine (“the Maine properties”), that the United States is trying to forfeit as part of a criminal prosecution in Massachusetts. The District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted the third-party claimants’ motion to dismiss the Maine properties from the indictment. Because we find that the third-party claims were premature under the applicable criminal forfeiture statute, we vacate the order of dismissal and remand for further proceedings.
/.
The government…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. ReckmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Arthur J. Halleran, Jr., Etc. v. Harry M. Hoffman, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. ReganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Twp 17 R 4, Certain Real Property in Maine, United States of America v. Twp 17 R 4, Certain Real Property in Maine, Patrick CunanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Liquidators of European Federal Credit BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. CunanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Shirley A. Jones, Mega-Universal Oxygen and Home Care Services, Inc., National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Perseptive Biosystems, Inc. v. Pharmacia Biotech, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Roberts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.