Legal Opinion
State v. Frazier
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 19, 1995No. 12880PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The defendant was charged by substitute information with sale of a narcotic substance in viola*371tion of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a).1 The defendant was also charged in a separate substitute information with possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a) and with possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of General Statutes § 21a-267 (a).2 These two informations were consolidated for trial before a single jury. After a jury trial, the defendant was found guilty on all counts. The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction. On…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. BartonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. GaynorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BarberConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. FasanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. LeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. ThompsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- State v. GilbertConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.