Gibbs v. Bardahl Oil Company
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
DALTON, Judge.
By this action plaintiff seeks to recover a judgment against defendant for $25,000, being the alleged reasonable value of plaintiff’s services to defendant, as rendered under the circumstances hereinafter stated. Verdict and judgment were for defendant, but the court set the judgment aside and granted plaintiff a new trial on the ground that the court erred in giving Instruction No. 4, requested by defendant. Defendant has appealed and here contends that “Instruction 4 correctly stated the law applicable to the facts of this case” and that the court erred in granting plaintiff a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lilly v. BoswellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Bushwick-Decatur Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Superior Concrete Accessories, Inc. v. KemperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Beebe v. the Columbia Axle Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1938
- Glover v. HendersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rolscreen Company, an Iowa Corporation v. Pella Products of St. Louis, Incorporated, a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- James M. Bain, Jr. And Donald O. Brashears v. Champlin Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. RubenfeldCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Cox v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- AG-CHEM Equipment Co. v. Hahn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.