Griffin v. Tatum Chevrolet Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
The suit is for a -breach of warranty in the sale of an automobile.
The contract was in writing, duly signed by both parties, and there is no charge of fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation involved. Among other numerous provisions, here unnecessary to note, was the following: “No warranties, express or implied, representations, promises or statements have been made by seller unless endorsed hereon in writing.” None were so indorsed.
Plaintiff alleges that in the purchase of the car, defendant’s agent warranted it to be free from defects in material and work^ manship, and that it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Holczstein v. Bessemer Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Vandegrift v. Abbott.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Bissell Motor Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- McGowin Lumber & Export Co. v. R. J. & B. F. Camp Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Miller Bros. v. Direct Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alabama Power Co. v. PierreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Epperson v. StaceySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Grady v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Commercial Credit Co. v. SealeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.