Legal Opinion

State v. White

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 18, 1966No. 2 CA-CR 46PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Darwin Nelson White, was complained against for assault with intent to commit an infamous crime against nature, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-252. At his arraignment before the Justice of the Peace he was advised of his rights to counsel and waived a preliminary hearing.

An information was filed in the Superior Court of Pima County on April 1; Í965', !and counsel was duly appointed. ' ' ‘

Defendant’s counsel moved for a hearing under the provisions of Rules of Criminal Procedure No. 250, Vol. 17 A.R.S. After due hearing the court found that deféáda'nt was able to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BurrellArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Rugg v. BurrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. State v. ShumwayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DenmonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  2. State v. Van DornCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. State v. ParhamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. State v. YazzieCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. State v. FarnhamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API