Legal Opinion

State v. Denmon

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 20, 1966No. 2 CA-CR 55PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Charlie Denmon, was tried and convicted of the crime of grand theft, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-661 and § 13-663. From the conviction and sentence to the Arizona State Prison he appeals.

Appellant’s court appointed counsel has filed an affidavit in this Court stating that he has corresponded with appellant, discussed the case with the defense counsel in the trial court, examined the file and the reporter’s transcript of the trial and has examined all proceedings which have occurred in the matter and states that he finds no reversible or prejudicial error, no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BurrellArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Rugg v. BurrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. State v. ShumwayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Denmon v. State Ex Rel. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. State v. ParhamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. State v. YazzieCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. State v. FarnhamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API