Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Vitello
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County: Hon. S. L. Carpenter, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey
Before considering the merits of the exceptions made by appellant, it may be well to state that something like two years after appellee had filed her written brief she filed a supplemental brief, wherein she claimed that the record and the abstract in this case are in such condition that the case cannot be reviewed because—
First: The motion to suppress the Farnum deposition is not before the court for the reason that it is not incorporated in the bill of exceptions.
Second: The sufficiency of the evidence cannot be considered because the bill of exceptions does not include the depositions of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Combs v. Agricultural Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Caron v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Rhode v. SteinmetzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
- Mitchell v. ReedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Smuggler Union Mining Co. v. BroderickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thuringer v. TraftonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Wallbank v. RothenbergColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Federal Oil & Gas Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Mid-Co Petroleum Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- United States v. SteadmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.