Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Rebecca Ann Smith, United States of America v. Clifford Rickard Arthur

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 10, 1982No. 80-1380, 80-1479Published

1Dissent

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge, with whom BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge,

joins, dissenting:

Congress has told federal judges that youths who are entitled to probation under the Youth Corrections Act may not be put in jail as a condition precedent to receiving probation. I therefore dissent.

The majority holds that “split sentences, as authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3651, are permissible under the YCA.” This conclusion follows from the premise that “courts sentencing youth offenders are meant to enjoy whatever powers are conferred by section 3651 as amended since 1950.”

It must be assumed that the majority’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Ralston v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Jerry Wayne Watts v. John T. Hadden, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API