Legal Opinion
Holmes v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 1990No. 86-1203, 88-1427PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
In these consolidated appeals, Kelvin L. Holmes challenges his convictions for assault with intent to kill while armed, assault with intent to rob while armed, both in violation of D.C.Code §§ 22-501, -3202 (1989 & 1990 Supp.), and obstruction of justice (injuring a witness), id. § 22-722(a)(5) (1989). He also appeals from the denials of his motion to vacate sentence and motion for a new trial, and further claims that the trial judge should have granted his motion to suppress tangible evidence. Because we agree with Holmes that certain evidence was improperly admitted…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Comford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Holiday v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Castillo-Campos v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.