Legal Opinion
Unterberg Harris Private Equity Partners, L.P. v. Xerox Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 3, 1998No. 96 Civ. 7645 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Xerox Corporation, Xerox Venture Capital, (“Xerox”), Donald E. Riley, (“Riley”), Leroy W. Haythorn (“Haythorn”), and Microlytics, Inc., (“Microlytics”) (collectively, “Defendants”) move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., in this securities fraud action filed by plaintiff Unterberg Harris Private Equity Partners, L.P., (“Unterberg”). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is hereby granted.
Parties
Unterberg is formed of a group of limited partnerships specializing in investing with principal places of business in New York…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Suez Equity Investors, L.P. v. Toronto-Dominion BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- D.E. & J Ltd. Partnership v. ConawayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Suez Equity Investors, L.P. v. The Toronto-Dominion BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001