Legal Opinion

Kendrick v. Barker

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 2001No. 99-333PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[¶ 1] In this appeal, we consider whether the district court properly enforced an oral settlement agreement and ruled that, as a matter of law, Wyoming does not recognize unknown injury as grounds for finding that mutual mistake warrants setting aside an agreement to release all personal injury claims.

[¶ 2] We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 3] Appellant Stephanie B. Kendrick presents these issues for our review:

I. Did the district judge commit error in granting the defendant's motion for enforcement of settlement agreement when there existed a mutual mistake between the parties as to the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Eddie Adams v. Norman Carlson, Director of the Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  2. Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. McCullough v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Sanger v. Yellow Cab Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. v. DexterWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Collins v. FinnellWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Capshaw v. SchieckWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Jacoby v. JacobyWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Pittard v. Great Lakes AviationWyoming Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API